Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 866 NE2D 812 - Jones v. Jones

Jones v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
August 2013
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 152 Ind. App. 9 - Borowski v. Rupert · Hubbard v. Hubbard · Volunteers of America v. Premier Auto Acceptance Corp. · Weida v. Kegarise · Rohrer v. Rohrer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A trial court is vested with broad discretion to determine whether it will grant or deny a motion to correct error. Volunteers of America v. Premier Auto Acceptance Corp., 755 N.E.2d 656, 658 (Ind.Ct.App.2001). A trial court has abused its discretion only if its decision is clearly against the logic and effect of the facts and circumstances before the court or the reasonable inferences therefrom. Id. The trial court’s decision comes to us cloaked in a presumption of correctness, and the appellant has the burden of proving that the trial court abused its discretion. Id. In making our determination, we may neither reweigh the evidence nor judge the credibility of witnesses. Id.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.