Boyd v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
3
states following
June 2012
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Crawford v. Washington · Davis v. Washington · Reynolds v. States · McHenry v. State · Wright v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Although the Indiana Rules of Evidence do not contain a similar provision [analogous to Federal Rule of Evidence 804(b)(6)], we see no reason why the doctrine of forfeiture by wrongdoing may not be applied as a matter of common law”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Byrd“In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right ... to be confronted with the witnesses against him....”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Thompson“If these rules do not cover a specific evidence issue, common or statutory law shall apply.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Byrd
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.