State v. Rangel’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently July 2017
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Carter · State v. Johnson · State v. Johnson · Wells v. Children's Aid Soc. of Utah · 23 Utah 2d 365 - State v. Tritt
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“must enter an objection on the record that is both timely and specific.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Whether and to what extent witnesses should be excluded is generally within the prerogative of the trial judge.... [The judge's] actions thereon should not be disturbed on appeal unless it clearly appears that he abused his discretion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State Ex Rel. A.M.D.“so that they cannot hear the testimony of other witnesses,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.