Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

866 So. 2d 121

S.F. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 11, 2004

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2004-02-11

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently May 2004

1 state decisions

Relies on Anders v. California · Phillips v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2004-02-11

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Appellant, S.F., a child, was found guilty of petit theft and intimidating a witness and placed on probation. The public defender’s officer filed a brief and motion to withdraw under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). We agree there are no arguable issues on appeal and affirm; however, one issue must be addressed on remand. See Bell v. State, 798 So.2d 796 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001).

¶2The disposition order related to the petit theft charge incorrectly describes the offense as a first-degree misdemeanor. The order should reflect the offense as a second-degree misdemeanor. It appears this is merely a scrivener’s error that requires correction, but not reversal. See id.

POLEN, KLEIN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.
/866/so2d/121 · .json · Public domain