Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 866 SO2D 192 - Howell v. Winkle

Howell v. Winkle’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
May 2015
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 571 So. 2d 422 - Goldschmidt v. Holman · Howard v. State · Home Depot USA Co., Inc. v. Taylor · US Fire Ins. Co. v. Progressive Cas. Ins. Co. · Sotuyo v. Williams

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “there is evidence supporting an inference of comparative fault on the part of the plaintiff, issue of comparative negligence should be submitted to jury”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[b]efore granting a directed verdict, the trial court must view the evidence and testimony in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “if there is any evidence upon which a jury could lawfully find for the nonmoving party, a verdict should not be directed”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.