Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 866 So. 2d 208 - Purchase v. State

866 So. 2d 208 - Purchase v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
August 2016
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on F. K. G. Co. v. Keys Bottled Gas Co. · Genden v. Fuller · 450 So. 2d 203 - State v. Vazquez · Childers v. State · 408 So. 2d 756 - Allied Fidelity Ins. Co. v. STATE, ETC.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “on the other hand has been defined as the voluntary termination of proceedings by the state before an information is filed. Genden v. Fuller, 648 So.2d 1183 , 1183 n. 1 (Fla.1994); Allied Fidelity Ins. Co. v. State for Use and Benefit of Dade County, 408 So.2d 756 , 756 n. 1 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982) (”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “serves the purpose of letting a person who has been arrested know that an information will not be filed or an indictment will not be sought. Id. at 208-09; see also Wilson v. Renfroe, 91 So.2d 857 , 859 (Fla.1956) (”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “A `no action' is a dismissal of the pending charges before an information or indictment has been filed; a nolle prosequi is the dismissal of a pending information or indictment.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.