State v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
December 2006
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Vasquez v. Hillery · Dublin v. United States Bankruptcy Court · 785 So. 2d 1 - Morial v. Smith & Wesson Corp. · Rideau v. Whitley · 712 So. 2d 46 - Kimball v. Allstate Ins. Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Accordingly, the error does not require reversal of defendant’s conviction, sentence and indictment. Therefore, on rehearing, the defendant’s conviction and sentence are affirmed.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“[a] judgment or ruling shall not be reversed by an appellate court because of any error, defect, irregularity, or variance which does not affect substantial rights of the accused.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“At his trial, Johnson, a black male, moved to quash the indictment because of racial discrimination in the selection of the grand jury foreman but the motion was denied.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.