Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 866 So. 2d 674 - Ault v. State

866 So. 2d 674 - Ault v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

30 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Apprendi v. New Jersey · Rhode Island v. Innis · Witherspoon v. Illinois · Wainwright v. Witt

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the aggravating circumstance that the murder was committed in the course of committing a specified felony is unconstitutional because it constitutes an automatic aggravator and does not narrow the class of persons eligible for the death penalty.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “whether the composition of the jury panel as a whole could possibly have been affected by the trial court's error.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “prevent or substantially impair the performance of his or her duties as a juror in accordance with the juror's instructions or oath.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.