866 So. 2d 674 - Ault v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
31
cited by 31 later decisions
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited
30 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Apprendi v. New Jersey · Rhode Island v. Innis · Witherspoon v. Illinois · Wainwright v. Witt
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the aggravating circumstance that the murder was committed in the course of committing a specified felony is unconstitutional because it constitutes an automatic aggravator and does not narrow the class of persons eligible for the death penalty.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Rogers v. State · Stephens v. State“whether the composition of the jury panel as a whole could possibly have been affected by the trial court's error.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“prevent or substantially impair the performance of his or her duties as a juror in accordance with the juror's instructions or oath.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.