Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 866 SO2D 742 - Austin v. Crosby

Austin v. Crosby’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Turner v. Safley · O'Lone v. Estate of Shabazz · Anschuetz & Co. v. Mississippi River Bridge Authority · Wrenn v. Capstone Medical Center · 835 So. 2d 259 - State v. Carter

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Mandamus is a common law remedy used to enforce an established legal right by compelling a person in an official capacity to perform an indisputable ministerial duty required by law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “A duty or act is ministerial when there is no room for the exercise of discretion, and the performance being required is directed by law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “an indisputable legal duty on the part of the respondent”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.