Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

866 So. 2d 777

Markham v. Gold

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2004-03-03

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently November 2005

1 state decisions

Relies on 826 So. 2d 221 - Moakley v. Smallwood · 714 So. 2d 356 - Bitterman v. Bitterman

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2004-03-03

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We affirm the decision granting an agricultural classification to appellees’ property. We reverse the award of attorney’s fees under section 57.105, Florida Statutes (1998). We remand to the circuit court, which may consider the propriety of attorney’s fees on appellees’ motion for sanctions relating to their motion to strike amended complaint. See Moakley v. Smallwood, 826 So.2d 221 (Fla.2002); Bitterman v. Bitterman, 714 So.2d 356 (Fla.1998).

STONE, GROSS and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.
/866/so2d/777 · .json · Public domain