Webb v. Persyn’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently July 2016
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 37th Judicial District Court)
Relationships
Relies on Pierce v. Reynolds · Abbott Laboratories v. Gravis · Texas Water Rights Commission v. Crow Iron Works · Gracia v. RC Cola-7-Up Bottling Co. · Soto v. Phillips
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a) A judgment or a determination of fact or law in a proceeding in a lower trial court is not res judicata and is not a basis for estoppel by judgment in a proceeding in a district court, except that a judgment rendered in a lower trial court is binding on the parties thereto as to recovery or denial of recovery. (b) This section does not apply to a judgment in probate, guardianship, mental health, or other matter in which a lower trial court has exclusive subject matter ju risdiction on a basis other than the amount in controversy. (c) For the purposes of this section, a "lower trial court” is a small claims court, a justice of the peace court, a county court, or a statutory county court.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“A judgment or a determination of fact or law in a proceeding in small claims court or justice of the peace court is not res judicata and does not constitute a basis for estoppel by judgment in a proceeding in a county court or statutory county court, except that the judgment rendered is binding on the parties thereto as to recovery or denial of recovery.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.