Moreno v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
11 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 339th Judicial District Court)
Relationships
Relies on Evitts v. Lucey · TransAmerican Natural Gas Corp. v. Powell · Grand Prairie Independent School District v. Southern Parts Imports, Inc. · Diaz v. State · Inpetco, Inc. v. Texas American Bank/Houston N.A.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]f the judgment was rendered upon [the defendant’s] plea of guilty or nolo conten-dere pursuant to Article 1.15, Code of Criminal Procedure, and the punishment assessed does not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant and his attorney, in order to prosecute an appeal for a nonjurisdictional defect or error that occurred prior to entry of the plea the notice shall state that the trial court granted permission to appeal or shall specify that those matters were raised by written motion and ruled on before trial.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Flores v. State · Davis v. State“this written notice of appeal of said conviction to the Court of Appeals pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 40(b)(1).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[t]he language of rule 40(b)(1) is `unequivocally mandatory.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Davis v. State · Diaz v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.