Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 866 SW2D 711 - Broxton v. State

Broxton v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
April 1999
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Halper · United States v. Felix · Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Sullivan v. Ashe · Phillips v. State · United States v. McCormick

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he crux of Broxton's complaint is that the State used the extraneous offenses as a basis for the death penalty. He received the death penalty. Therefore, double jeopardy bars a second punishment for those offenses in a subsequent trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “no person, for the same offense, shall be twice put in jeopardy of life or liberty, nor shall a person be again put upon trial for the same offense, after a verdict of not guilty in a court of competent jurisdiction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “This court and other Texas courts of appeals have determined that double jeopardy does not apply under these circumstances.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.