Holtzman v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
October 2000
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Guillot v. State · Rodriguez v. State · Harris v. State · Langston v. State · Prior v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1) a motion alleging violation of the terms of probation was filed prior to the expiration of the probationary period; 2) a capias or arrest warrant was issued prior to the expiration of the term; 3) the State used due diligence in apprehending the probationer, and in hearing and determining the allegations in the motion, (emphasis added.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. McKelvy v. State“due diligence in hearing and determining the allegations in the revocation motion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re JAD
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.