Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 867 F.2d 1035 - Singh v. Moyer

Singh v. Moyer’s Empirical Analysis

867 F.2d 1035 · 1989

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
December 2013
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently December 2013

12 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

1201989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 5 U.S.C. § 701 · 5 U.S.C. § 706 · 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe · Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner · Heckler v. Chaney · Johnson v. Mississippi · Consolidation Coal Co. v. South-East Coal Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “meaningful standard against which [we can] judge the agency's exercise of discretion.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “In determining whether a 'meaningful standard' for review is available, this court considers four areas: the statutory language, the statutory structure, the legislative history, and the nature of the agency action.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the statutory language is void of criteria in which to judge how the Director determines the content of his inquiry or the nature of his recommendation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.