Hammock v. Bowen’s Empirical Analysis
867 F.2d 1209 · 1989
Citation profile
13 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2412 · 42 U.S.C. § 1381 (§ 1601 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 401 (§ 201 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Pierce v. Underwood · Zaldivar v. City of Los Angeles · Sprague v. Bowen · Cotton v. Bowen · MaCgregor v. Bowen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“unless the court finds that the position of the United States was substantially justified....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Swenson v. Sullivan“could reasonably be expected to produce the pain,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Russell v. Louis W
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.