Arbitration No Aaa13-161-0511-85 Under Grain Arbitration Rules Government of India v. Cargill Incorporated’s Empirical Analysis
867 F.2d 130 · 1989
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 3 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently March 2016 · most notably DiRussa v. Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. (1997), Duferco International Steel Trading v. T. Klaveness Shipping A/S (2003)
12 federal appellate · 3 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 9 U.S.C. § 10 (Federal Arbitration Act)
Relies on Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp. · United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co. · At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications Workers · Wilko v. Swan · Shearson/American Express Inc. v. McMahon
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“any doubts concerning the scope of arbitrable issues should be resolved in favor of arbitration, whether the problem is the construction of the contract language itself or an allegation of waiver, delay, or a like defense to arbitrability.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[W]e believe it to be a better rule that any limitation upon the time in which an arbitrator can render his award [is] a directory limitation, not a mandatory one.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“one of those rare instances when only a court should have passed on the time-bar question.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.