Ferenc v. Dugger’s Empirical Analysis
867 F.2d 1301 · 1989
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently July 2018
3 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on United States v. Leon · Ashe v. Swenson · Calder v. United States · United States v. Mock · United States v. Lee
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“means simply that when an issue of ultimate fact has once been determined by a valid and final judgment, that issue cannot again be litigated between the same parties in any future lawsuit.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Delap v. Dugger“completely bar subsequent prosecution where one of the facts necessarily determined in the former trial is an essential element”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Huffine“the government from relitigating certain facts”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Huffine
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.