Barrett v. Adams Fruit Co.’s Empirical Analysis
867 F.2d 1305 · 1989
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
Appellate journey
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 4126 · 29 U.S.C. § 1841 (Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act)) · 29 U.S.C. § 1854 (Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act)) · 29 U.S.C. § 1871 (Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-Fonseca · Hines v. Davidowitz · Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. Paul · Fidelity Federal Savings and Loan Association v. D Cuesta
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is intended to supplement State law, and compliance with [the statute] shall not excuse any person from compliance with appropriate State law and regulation”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“is the employer of any migrant or seasonal agricultural worker for purposes of a State workers' compensation law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“shall be exclusive and in place of all other liability of such employer to . . . the employee,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.