Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 867 F.2d 22 - Boston Athletic Association v. Sullivan

Boston Athletic Association v. Sullivan’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

214
cited by 214 later decisions
1
states following
August 2024
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 194 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 214 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably Casas Office Machines, Inc. v. Mita Copystar America, Inc. (1994), International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers v. Winship Green Nursing Center (1996)

6 federal appellate · 194 district · 1 state decisions

99019891990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Starnes v. Penrod Drilling Co. · International News Service v. Associated Press · Federal Energy Administration v. Algonquin SNG, Inc. · Robert C. Hahn v. Francis W. Sargent · Texas v. Certain Named & Unnamed Undocumented Alien Children

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 214 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the similarity of the marks; (2) the similarity of the goods; (3) the relationship between the parties’ channels of trade; (4) the relationship between the parties’ advertising; (5) the classes of prospective purchasers; (6) evidence of actual confusion; (7) the defendant’s intent in adopting its mark; and (8) the strength of the plaintiffs mark.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Any person who shall, without the consent of the registrant— (a) use in commerce any reproduction, counterfeit, copy, or colorable imitation of a registered mark in connection with the sale, offering for sale, distribution, or advertising of any goods or services on or in connection with which such use is likely to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive shall be liable in a civil action by the registrant for the remedies hereinafter provided.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.