Templin v. Weisgram’s Empirical Analysis
867 F.2d 240 · 1989
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 12 U.S.C. § 1823
Relies on D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit Insurance · California State Board of Equalization v. Western Marina Corp. · Langley v. Federal Deposit Insurance · ITT Continental Baking Co. v. William Inglis & Sons Baking Co. · Gunter v. Hutcheson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he defense of fraud in the factum does not involve proof of any side agreements; rather, a party must show that, solely as a result of another party's actions, he signed a document without full knowledge of the 'character or essential terms' of the instrument.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[w]here, as here, ... an instrument's invalidity can be established only by reference to a side agreement ... the reasoning and legislative intent underlying section 1823(e) apply with full force.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“quintessentially the type of conduct against which Sec. 1823(e) was designed to protect the FDIC.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.