Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 867 F.2d 278 - Deckebach

Deckebach’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
June 2015
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently June 2015

4 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

501980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Securities & Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co. · Tcherepnin v. Knight · Brewer v. United States · Acosta v. United States · 102 S. Ct. 969 - United States v. Security Industrial Bank

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A]ny note, stock, treasury stock, bond, debenture, evidence of indebtedness, certificate of interest or participation in any profit-sharing agreement, collateral-trust certificate, preorganization certificate or subscription, transferable share, investment contract, voting-trust certificate, certificate of deposit for a security, fractional undivided interest in oil, gas, or other mineral rights, or, in general, any interest or instrument commonly known as a “security”, or any certificate of interest or participation in, temporary or interim certificate for, receipt for, guarantee of, or warrant or right to subscribe to or purchase, any of the foregoing.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(1)An offeree furnishes initial value to an offeror, (2) A portion of the initial value is subjected to the risks of the enterprise, (3) The furnishing of the initial value is induced by the offeror’s promises or representations which give rise to a reasonable understanding that a valuable benefit of some kind, over and above the initial value, will accrue to the offeree as a result of the operation of the enterprise, and (4) The offeree does not receive the right to exercise practical and actual control over managerial decisions of the enterprise.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The question ... is whether it appears that the contributed sums would reasonably find their way into the general operations of the enterprise. Stated another way, it is whether such investment will become a part of the capital pool used to conduct the business being promoted by the offeror. If so, such initial value furnished by the offeree may be considered as risk capital of the enterprise.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.