In Re Gary Thompson and Randalyn Thompsonss Appeal of Abbotsford State Bank’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently November 2020 · most notably Levit Vn v. Ingersoll Rand Financial Corporation (1989), 29 114 75276 Yonikus Yonikus
10 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Armstrong v. United States · Louisville Joint Stock Land Bank v. Radford · United States v. Security Industrial Bank · Holt v. Henley · Wisconsin Knife Works v. National Metal Crafters
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“lien avoidance is not a taking when it is authorized before the creditor makes the secured loan in question . . . section 522(f), when as here it is applied prospectively, does not violate the takings clause of the Fifth Amendment,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[L]ien avoidance is not a taking when it is authorized before the creditor makes the secured loan in question....”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“implements, professional books, or tools, of the trade of the debtor.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.