Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 867 F.2d 693 - Hall v. Baker

Hall v. Baker’s Empirical Analysis

867 F.2d 693 · 1989

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
August 2012
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently August 2012

4 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

501989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 22 U.S.C. § 3901 (Department of State Special Agents Retirement Act of 1998) · 22 U.S.C. § 4002 · 22 U.S.C. § 4008 · 22 U.S.C. § 4131 · 22 U.S.C. § 4135 · 22 U.S.C. § 4139 · 22 U.S.C. § 4140 · 22 U.S.C. § 4172

Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Greater Boston Television Corporation v. Federal Communications Commission, Whdh, Inc., a Massachusettscorporation, Intervenor. Whdh, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Greater Boston Televisioncorporation, a Massachusetts Corporation, Intervenor. Charles River Civic Television, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Whdh, Inc., Boston Broadcastersinc., Intervenors. Whdh, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Boston Broadcasters, Inc., Intervenor. Greater Boston Tv Co., Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Whdh, Inc., Boston Broadcastersinc., Intervenors · Brady v. Ohio · Hatch v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission · Thomas Radio Co. v. Federal Communications Commission

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “in changing its course of policy, an agency [must] indicate that prior policies are being expressly changed and not casually ignored.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “revisit[ing] existing interpretations of statutes that the [292 U.S.App.D.C. 208] agency is called on to administer.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.