Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 867 F.3d 230 - United States v. Buffis

United States v. Buffis’s Empirical Analysis

867 F.3d 230 · 2017

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
June 2025
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1951 (Hobbs Act)

Relies on United States v. Zannino · Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States · Evans v. United States · United States v. Hathaway · Ocasio v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “is defined under the Hobbs Act as 'the obtaining of property from another, with his consent, induced by wrongful use of actual or threatened force, violence, or fear, or under color of official right.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “show that a public official has obtained a payment to which he was not entitled, knowing that the payment was made in return for official acts.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “that proof of bribery cannot be proof of extortion [under color of official right] (and vice-versa)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.