March v. Mills’s Empirical Analysis
867 F.3d 46 · 2017
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently October 2021
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1292 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Grayned v. City of Rockford · United States v. O'Brien · Ward v. Rock Against Racism · Hague v. Committee for Industrial Organization · Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for Vincent
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“tend[ing] to bring that foreign government into 'public odium' or 'public disrepute,' " to be content-based because it "regulate[d] speech due to its potential primary impact.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“restrict[ed] noisemaking even in public parks, plazas, sidewalks, [and] other traditional public fora.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“adopted by the government because of disagreement with the message [the speech] conveys,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.