Hill v. Coggins’s Empirical Analysis
867 F.3d 499 · 2017
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 16 U.S.C. § 1532 (§ 3 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973) · 16 U.S.C. § 1533 (§ 4 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973) · 16 U.S.C. § 1538 (§ 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973) · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 7 U.S.C. § 2131 (Animal Welfare Act) · 7 U.S.C. § 2143 · 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Friends of the Earth Incorporateds v. Laidlaw Environmental Services Inc · Singleton v. Wulff · Grayned v. City of Rockford · Sierra Club v. Morton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“considered the conflicting evidence, weighed the credibility of witnesses, [and] assessed the relevant discovery history”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“substantially change the character of the case and render obsolete much of the parties' trial preparation”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“purpose to protect endangered and threatened”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.