Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 867 N.E.2d 144 - Drane v. State

Drane v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

229
cited by 229 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

229 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on McHenry v. State · Jenkins v. State · Wright v. State · Moore v. State · Tobar v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 229 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “no reasonable fact-finder could find the elements of the crime proven beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    85 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “cireumstan-tial evidence will be deemed sufficient if inferences may reasonably be drawn that enable the trier of fact to find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Accounting for the trial court's role as finder of fact to decide what evidence to credit, the task for us, as an appellate tribunal, is to decide whether the facts favorable to the verdict represent substantial evidence probative of the elements of the offenses.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.