Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

867 So. 2d 1280

Botarf v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2004-03-26

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently September 2005

2 state decisions

Relies on 855 So. 2d 1260 - Ray v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2004-03-26

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Based on the State’s concession of error, for which we commend it, the order finding Botarf in violation of his probation and the sentence imposed thereafter is reversed. On remand, the State may proceed on the original affidavit alleging that Botarf violated his probation, or may amend it. See Ray v. State, 855 So.2d 1260 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003).

¶2REVERSED AND REMANDED.

PLEUS, PALMER and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.
/867/so2d/1280 · .json · Public domain