Korn v. Korn’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
12 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on 455 So. 2d 863 - Ex Parte McLendon · O'Neal v. O'Neal · Emerick v. Emerick · Ex Parte Johnson · 577 So. 2d 461 - Hovater v. Hovater
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Under Alabama law, periodic alimony ‘is to support the former dependent spouse and enable that spouse, to the extent possible, to maintain the status that the parties had enjoyed during the marriage, until that spouse is self-supporting or maintaining a lifestyle or status similar to the one enjoyed during the marriage.’ O’Neal v. O’Neal, 678 So.2d 161 , 164 (Ala.Civ.App.1996).””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Santiago v. Santiago“[T]here is no evidentiary basis for the determination of future events and . . . there exists an adequate procedure for modification when changes in circumstances do occur.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Tjh v. Snf
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.