867 So. 2d 479 - Prather v. Process Systems’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 55 So. 2d 741 - US Casualty Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co. · 625 So. 2d 868 - Ullman v. City of Tampa Parks Dept. · Closet Maid v. Sykes · A.M.V. v. State · McKesson Drug Co. v. Williams
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he opinion of the expert medical advisor is presumed to be correct unless there is clear and convincing evidence to the contrary as determined by the judge of compensation claims.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.