Pearson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
November 2016
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 634 So. 2d 607 - Novaton v. State · 634 So. 2d 153 - Sirmons v. State · 581 So. 2d 641 - State v. Miller · Hubbard v. State · 804 So. 2d 433 - Netherly v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In determining what is reasonable, inability to locate "the defendant after diligent search or the defendant’s absence from the state shall be considered. The failure to execute process on or extradite a defendant in another state who has been charged by information or indictment with a crime in this state shall not constitute an unreasonable delay.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Robinson v. State“The period of limitation does not run during any time when the defendant is continuously absent from the state or has no reasonably ascertainable place of abode or work within the state, but in no case shall this provision extend the period of limitation otherwise applicable by more than 3 years.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Goings v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.