Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

867 So. 2d 617

Luke v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2004-03-10

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 2004

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2004-03-10

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Sherod Dion Luke appeals his judgment and sentence for conspiracy to commit robbery. We affirm the conviction but remand to correct a scrivener’s error in the judgment. The judgment erroneously lists Mr. Luke’s conviction as conspiracy to commit robbery with a firearm, a second-degree felony. The State concedes that the judgment should reflect the actual charge and conviction of conspiracy to commit robbery, a third-degree felony. See § 777.04, Fla. Stat. (2000).

¶2Affirmed; remanded to correct scrivener’s error.

ALTENBERND, C.J., and WHATLEY and NORTHCUTT, JJ., Concur.
/867/so2d/617 · .json · Public domain