Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

867 So. 2d 638

Bakarania v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2004-03-12

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently September 2005

1 state decisions

Relies on Haines v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2004-03-12

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Appellant challenges the Order and Amended Order entered on July 2, 2003, which vacated an earlier order. The State concedes error in that the trial court did not have jurisdiction due to an intervening Notice of Appeal. See Haines v. State, 805 So.2d 972 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001). Appellant’s remaining point on appeal is moot.

¶2The Order and Amended. Order dated July 2, 2003, are vacated.

THOMPSON, MONACO and TORPY, JJ., concur.
/867/so2d/638 · .json · Public domain