¶1Appellant challenges the Order and Amended Order entered on July 2, 2003, which vacated an earlier order. The State concedes error in that the trial court did not have jurisdiction due to an intervening Notice of Appeal. See Haines v. State, 805 So.2d 972 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001). Appellant’s remaining point on appeal is moot.
¶2The Order and Amended. Order dated July 2, 2003, are vacated.