867 So. 2d 639 - CDL v. Corea’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
November 2005
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the JCC should rule that the statements fall within the scope of section 440.105(4)(b)1.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.