867 So. 2d 745 - Shultz v. Shultz’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
September 2018
most recently cited
14 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 739 So. 2d 762 - Stogner v. Stogner · Carpenter v. Hannan · Carpenter v. Hannan · 748 So. 2d 594 - Custom-Bilt Cabinet v. Quality Built Cab. · 836 So. 2d 369 - Pittman v. Pittman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the supreme court has directed us to consider an appeal of the denial of a motion for new trial as an appeal of the judgment on the merits as well, when it is clear from the appellant's brief that he intended to appeal the merits of the case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Pittman v. Pittman, 01-2528, p. 3 (La.App. 1st Cir.12/20/02), 836 So.2d 369, 372 , writ denied, 03-1365 (La.9/19/03), 853 So.2d 642 . However,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The denial of a motion for new trial may be made by minute entry and does not require a signed judgment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Polk v. Buckhalter
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.