Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 867 SW2D 338 - State v. Bowling

State v. Bowling’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
May 2000
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Illinois v. Gates · Katz v. United States · Aguilar v. Texas · Spinelli v. United States · Smith v. Maryland

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[F]irst, has the individual manifested a subjective expectation of privacy in the object of the challenged search? Second, is society willing to recognize that expectation as reasonable?”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “That which a citizen knowingly exposes to the public is that in which he or she has not manifested [a] subjective expectation of privacy.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.