Maudlin v. Lang’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
31 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently September 2016 · most notably Campbell v. Labor & Industrial Relations Commission (1995), State v. Schleiermacher (1996)
31 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Murphy v. Carron · In Re Estate of LaGarce · Magee v. Blue Ridge Professional Building Co. · Matter of Estate of Hysinger · Estate of Huskey v. Monroe
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1) describing the named persons as “joint tenants;” 2) making the deposit “in form to be paid to any one or more of [the named persons];” or 3) making the deposit “in form to be paid to ... the survivor or survivors.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“WITHDRAWALS — Any one of you who signs on the reverse side may withdraw or transfer all or any part of the account balance at any time on forms approved by us.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“When a deposit is made by any person in the name of the depositor and any one or more other persons, whether minor or adult, as joint tenants or in form to be paid to any one or more of them, or the surviv- or or survivors of them and whether or not the names are stated in the conjunctive or the disjunctive or otherwise, the deposit thereupon and any additions thereto made by any of these persons, upon the making thereof, shall become the property of these persons as joint tenants, and the same, together with all interest thereon, shall be held for the exclusive use of the persons so named, and may be paid to any one of such persons during his lifetime, or to any one of the survivors of them after the death of any one or more of them. The making of a deposit in such form, and the making of additions thereto, in the absence of fraud or undue influence, shall be conclusive evidence in any action or proceeding to which either the bank or trust company or any survivor is a party of the intention of all the parties to the account to vest title to the account and the additions thereto and all interest thereon in the survivor.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Braden v. Von Stuck
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.