Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 867 S.W.2d 769 - State v. Schmidt

State v. Schmidt’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

66
cited by 66 later decisions
9
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

65 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 66 later decisions — most recently June 2018 · most notably Interstate Northborough Partnership v. State (2001), State v. Heal (1996)

65 state decisions

280199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin))

Relationships

Relies on Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp. · State v. Carpenter · Campbell v. United States · Gainesville, Henrietta & Western Railway Co. v. Hall · City of Dallas v. Priolo

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 66 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the land taken from the condemnee landowner was indispensable to the ... project; (2) the land taken constituted a substantial (not inconsequential) part of the tract devoted to the project; and (3) the damages resulting to the land not taken from the use of the land taken were inseparable from those to the same land flowing from the condemnor government’s use of its adjoining land in the ... project.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “In estimating injury or benefit under Subsection (c), the special commissioners shall consider an injury or benefit that is peculiar to the property owner and that relates to the property owner’s ownership, use, or enjoyment of the particular parcel of real property, but they may not consider an injury or benefit that the property owner experiences in common with the general community.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “If a portion of a tract or parcel of real property is condemned, the special commissioners shall determine the damage to the property owner after estimating the extent of the injury and benefit to the property owner, including the effect of the condemnation on the value of the property owner’s remaining property.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.