Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 867 SW2D 791 - Beall v. Ditmore

Beall v. Ditmore’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
1
states following
April 2010
most recently cited

35 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently April 2010 · most notably Abraxas Petroleum Corp. v. Hornburg (2000), Bates v. Tesar (2002)

35 state decisions

180199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In Re King's Estate · Benoit v. Wilson · Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Scharrenbeck · Ethington v. State · Bushell v. Dean

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In order to preserve a complaint for appellate review, a party must have presented to the trial court a timely request, objection, or motion, stating the specific grounds for the ruling he desired the court to make if the specific grounds were not apparent from the context. It is also necessary for the complaining party to obtain a ruling upon the party’s request, objection or motion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.