Easter v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently December 2016
13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Schad v. Arizona · Montgomery v. State · David W. McKay v. Texas · Reading Co. v. CJI Industries, Inc. · Harris v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“• the inherent probative value of the evidence; • the similarity of the conduct to the offense on trial; • the strength of the evidence of the extraneous conduct; • the nature of the extraneous conduct and its potential for impressing the jury in irrational, but indelible ways; • the time necessary to develop the evidence, giving consideration to whether the jury’s attention will be diverted from the offense on trial; and • the State’s need for the evidence including: (a) the availability of other evidence which tends to accomplish the same “other purpose”; (b) the strength of the other evidence; and (e) whether the purpose served by the admission of the extraneous conduct relates to an issue that is in dispute.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Horton v. State“is used to charge the offense itself, whereas a”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Dalton v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.