United States v. Bryan’s Empirical Analysis
868 F.2d 1032 · 1989
Citation profile
66 federal appellate · 9 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 127 later decisions — most recently September 2023 · most notably Sanchez v. United States (1995), 11 Cal. 4th 786 - People v. Memro (1995)
66 federal appellate · 9 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 26 U.S.C. § 7203 · 26 U.S.C. § 7206
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Bagley · Colorado v. Connelly · Pelaes v. United States · Wrenn v. McFadden
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 127 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The prosecutor will be deemed to have knowledge of and access to anything in the possession, custody or control of any federal agency participating in the same investigation of the defendant.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“United States v. Anguiano, 873 F.2d 1314 , 1319 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 110 S.Ct. 416, 107 L.Ed.2d 381 (1989) (quoting United States v. Bryan, 868 F.2d 1032 , 1038-39 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 110 S.Ct. 167, 107 L.Ed.2d 124 (1989). Reversal of a criminal conviction on the basis of plain error is an exceptional remedy invoked”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[T]he scope of the government’s obligation under Rule 16(a)(1)(C) should turn on the extent to which the prosecutor has knowledge of and access to the documents sought by the defendant in each case. The prosecutor will be deemed to have knowledge of and access to anything in the possession, custody or control of any federal agency participating in the same investigation of the defendant.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.