Silor v. Romero’s Empirical Analysis
868 F.2d 1419 · 1989
Citation profile
5 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently January 2007
5 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Carey v. Piphus · The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. Shipman · Memphis Community School District v. Stachura · Jamison Co. v. Westvaco Corp. · The Industrial Development Board of the Town of Section, Alabama v. Fuqua Industries, Inc., the Industrial Development Board of the City of Fort Payne, Alabama v. Fuqua Industries, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A jury needs more to base its award of lost business profits than testimony from the plaintiff that he has `suffered substantial damages'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.