United States v. Mares’s Empirical Analysis
868 F.2d 151 · 1989
Citation profile
22 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently March 2018 · most notably United States v. Ferguson (1990), Coady v. Vaughn (2001)
22 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York City · Swansboro Country, Inc. v. Lumberman's Mortgage Co. · Hensley v. Municipal Court, San Jose-Milpitas Judicial Dist., Santa Clara Cty. · Taylor v. United States · National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Claiborne Hardware Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“must proceed via a petition for habeas corpus”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“A claim for time served prior to the date of a federal sentence is not cognizable in a proceeding pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 36.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.