Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 868 F.2d 159 - Sisk v. Levings

Sisk v. Levings’s Empirical Analysis

868 F.2d 159 · 1989

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
September 2013
most recently cited

4 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently September 2013

4 federal appellate ·

601989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1988 · 7 U.S.C. § 1926

Relies on WCLR Radio Station v. Rengers · Elliott v. Perez · Rea v. United States · Auster Oil & Gas, Inc. v. Stream · City of Madison v. Bear Creek Water Ass'n

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[Ljitigiousness which gives rise to a common law tort action for misuse of legal procedure may be so egregious as to constitute a violation of Section 1983 as well, if the tort-feasor, under color of state law, subjects the tort victim to a deprivation of Constitutional dimension.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “A district court should refrain from granting a motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) unless it appears, from a reading of the plaintiff's complaint, that the plaintiff has failed to set forth facts which, if proven, would establish a violation of a constitutional right.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “encompassing three separate but related common law torts which protect the interest in freedom from unjustified litigation: (1) malicious prosecution; (2) wrongful civil proceedings; and (3) abuse of process.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.