Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 868 F.2d 172 - Washington v. Patlis

Washington v. Patlis’s Empirical Analysis

868 F.2d 172 · 1989

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
July 2017
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently July 2017

10 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

901989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 706 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens Council · Mohasco Corp. v. Silver · Love v. Pullman Co. · Unimet Corp. v. United Steelworkers · Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Commercial Office Products Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The federal act carves an exception for cases in which the person aggrieved has initially instituted proceedings with a state or local fair employment practice (FEP) agency having the authority to grant or seek relief, such as the TCHR. In that instance, the charge shall be filed with the EEOC within 300 days of the violation. A nominal filing is all that is required to “institute proceedings” under Section 706(e). The nominal filing required to institute state proceedings occurs when the EEOC transmits the complaint on a standard form. [Citations omitted].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “shall be served not later than 10 days after entry of the judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.