Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 868 F.2d 24 - United States v. Collamore

United States v. Collamore’s Empirical Analysis

868 F.2d 24 · 1989

Citation profile

74
cited by 74 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
8
states following
June 2020
most recently cited

47 federal appellate · 3 district · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 74 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2020 · most notably Old Chief v. United States (1997), United States v. Horn (1994)

47 federal appellate · 3 district · 12 state decisions

46019891990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1737 · 18 U.S.C. § 1961 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 3731 · 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 28 U.S.C. § 1651

Relies on Spencer v. State of Texas a Bell · Geders v. United States · Blanton v. General Electric Credit Corp. · Singer v. United States · Gregory v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 74 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “First, when a jury is neither read the statute setting forth the crime nor told of all the elements of the crime, it may, justifiably, question whether what the accused did was a crime. The present case is a stark example. Possession of a firearm by most people is not a crime. A juror who owns or who has friends and relatives who own firearms may wonder why [the defendant’s] possession was illegal. Doubt as to the criminality of [the defendant’s] conduct may influence the jury when it considers the possession element.”
    12 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “even in the face of an offer to stipulate, the government may choose to present evidence on the one felony necessary to prove the crime charged,”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “(a) The Supreme Court and all courts established by Act of Congress may issue all writs necessary or appropriate in aid of their respective jurisdictions and agreeable to the usages and principles of law.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.