United States v. Barte’s Empirical Analysis
868 F.2d 773 · 1989
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently September 2006
6 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1703 · 18 U.S.C. § 1709
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Miller v. Fenton · United States v. Bengivenga
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he derivative evidence rule operates only when an actual constitutional violation occurs, as where a suspect confesses in response to coercion”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.