Beighley v. Federal Deposit Insurance’s Empirical Analysis
868 F.2d 776 · 1989
Citation profile
104 federal appellate · 20 district · 44 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 270 later decisions — most recently February 2018 · most notably Resolution Trust Corp. v. Dunmar Corp. (1995), Bell Murphy and Associates Inc v. Interfirst Bank Gateway Na E (1990)
104 federal appellate · 20 district · 44 state decisions — followed in 13 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 12 U.S.C. § 1819 · 12 U.S.C. § 1823 · 12 U.S.C. § 194 · 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Relies on D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit Insurance · Langley v. Federal Deposit Insurance · Gilbert v. First National Bank of Jackson · Lambert Run Coal Co. v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad · Dewees v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 270 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(2) was executed by the depository institution and any person claiming an adverse interest thereunder . . . contemporaneously with the acquisition of the asset by the depository institution, (3) was approved by the board of directors of the depository institution or its loan committee . . ., and (4) has been, continuously, from the time of its execution, an official record of the depository institution.”
20 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“... are simply secret side agreements that the Court invalidated almost fifty years ago in D'Oench”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“protects the FDIC, as receiver of a failed bank or as purchaser of its assets, from a borrower who has 'lent himself to a scheme or arrangement' whereby banking authorities are likely to be misled.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.