Anderson v. Bowen’s Empirical Analysis
868 F.2d 921 · 1989
Citation profile
19 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 60 later decisions — most recently April 2012 · most notably Ehrhart v. Secretary of Health & Human Services (1992), Brewer v. Chater (1997)
19 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Richardson v. Perales · Stephens v. Heckler · Garfield v. Schweiker · Zblewski v. Schweiker · Zalewski v. Heckler
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“condition during the relevant time period encompassed by the [exclusion] under review, and there is good cause for not introducing the evidence during the administrative proceedings.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[w]ritten evaluation of every piece of testimony and submitted evidence is not required....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.